Charity: A Consideration of Responsibility

Everyday, at least everyday the physical mail arrives, our residence receives as many as a half dozen (and at times more) mail solicitations from charitable organizations. A similar stream of needs comes to us via Email.

While some might consider this a new nuisance, or a waste, or even harassment, by the charities, My partner and i decidedly do not. I consider the inflow reasonable, and the charities’ efforts to solicit as legitimate, and the imposition with me not a nuisance, but to the contrary a challenge. Not really a huge challenge in a sense of how to handle or dispose of the mail, as well as how to stem the flow, but a challenge as to the best way to respond in an ethically responsible and appropriate manner.
An interview with Yael Eckstein, Senior Vice President of the International Fellowship of Christian and Jews.

Therefore given a decision to not dismiss, or throw out, or simply ignore the incoming wave, what is the proper action? Should I give, and exactly how much? Now our household, as might be considered regular, earns sufficient income to cover necessities and some amenities, although we are not living in large luxury. We own typical brand (Chevy, Pontiac) cars, live in a modest sole family home, consider Saturday evening at the local pizza shop as eating out, and turn down the heat to keep the utility bills affordable.

Contributing thus falls within our means, but not without trade-offs, and even sacrifice.

So should we give? And how considerably? Let’s consider (and dismiss) some initial concerns, concerns which will otherwise deflect, diminish or even remove an obligation to give away.

The Legitimacy and Efficiency of Charities – Experiences surface, more often than desirable, highlighting unscrupulous individuals who prey on sympathy and use sham charity websites to collect charitable contributions but then keep the donations. Other stories uncover less than proficient actions by charities, for example excessive salaries, inappropriate advertising and marketing costs, lack of oversight. With this, then, why give?

Even though striking, these stories, as I scan the situation, represent outliers. The stories rate as news due to the very fact they will represent the atypical. Do I believe mainline charities, including Salvation Army, or Catholic Charities, or Doctors without having Borders, do I believe them so inefficient or dodgy to justify my not giving? No . Rather, the response, if I and anyone have concerns about a a good cause, is to research the charity, to check and find those that usually are worthy, and not to simply cast one’s obligation to one side.

Government and Business Role – Some may argue that government (by its programs), or business (through it has the contributions and community service), should handle charity desires and issues. Government and business have resources further than any that I or any one individual can garner.

My search again says I can not use this argument to side move my involvement. Government needs taxes, plus political agreement, both uncertain, to run social and charity programs, and businesses simply are not sufficiently in the business of charity can be expected them to carry the whole weight.

Deserving of our Amenities instructions Most individuals with a modest but comfortable status achieved this through sacrifice, and scholastic effort, and hard work, as well as daily discipline. We thus should not, and do not need to, truly feel guilt as we reasonably reward ourselves, and our people, with amenities. And the term amenities doesn’t imply decadence Amenities often include positive and admirable items, my partner and i. e. instructional summer camps, travel to educational places, purchase of healthy food, a family outing at an afternoon baseball game.

Nevertheless , while we earned our amenities, in a broader good sense we did not earn our stature at birth. Most in financial terms sufficient individuals and families likely have had the good bundle to be born into an economically productive setting, together with the opportunity for education, and the freedom to pursue and find occupation and advancement.

If we have that good fortune, if we ended up born into free, safe and relatively prosperous ailments, few of us would change our stature at birth to own been born in the dictatorship of North Korea, or maybe a slum in India, or a war-ravaged city in the Middle Distance, or doctorless village in Africa, or a decaying municipality in Siberia, or, since the Western world isn’t perfect, the impoverished neighborhood in the U. S., or a cold, wind-swept nomadic steppe in South America. Certainly much of any achievements comes from our own efforts. But much of it also comes from the actual luck of the draw on the stature into which we were born

Related Posts

About The Author